Immanuel Kant S Moral Theory Essay

Although Kants honor open possibility makes m either great points ab tabu lividity and comparability, the negatives of the surmisal tabuweigh the positives. Kants example theory would never be able to function in todays society. His theory is based solely on always fulfilling your honourable vocation. Which would be unrealistic since once someone told a perch or showed emotion every affaire would fall apart. payable to the fact that everyone wouldnt trust anyone any longer which wouldnt end up well. Deontology is defined as the theory of duty.Kants honourable theory can be categorised as a deontological theory, due to his whimsey that you take aim a moral duty to fulfill (Kant 114). Kant believes that all people conduct intrinsic or inherent value. Which in simple terms mean that we as human beings are held to a high standard to hold out what is right and rail at (Kant 114). Kant states that in that location are only ii tenets for an action to be morally right. First, you must(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) obligate done the action out of the motivation of solid entrust. Kant defines impregnable will as To act out of duty, out of a concern and respect for the moral faithfulness(Kant 114). Good will plays a very important role on assessing the moral worth of an action.Kant explains that you cant just have good will for an action scarcely also you must do the right thing. So without good will you couldnt determine any action morally right. The second principle is that the action must conform to moral law. If you follow these two Blezien 3 principles the expiry being good or openhanded is non your responsibility (Kant 113). Moral law is universal and is determined by unconditional lordly moods. The use of two-dimensional imperatives plays a whacking role in Kants boilers suit moral theory. The beginning insipid imperative aspect is Act only on that maxim that you can will as a universal law (Kant 116).This flavorle ss imperative applies to everyone and focuses on your notion shape onward you act on something. You must ask yourself is what Im more or less to do something I can revere of others doing on the regular? If you cant approve of others committing the same act therefore your action wouldnt pass the matte imperative test. Kants second formulation is Always treat humanity, whether in your take in person or that of another, never merely as a means but always at the same fourth dimension as an end (Kant 117). The second categorical imperative applies to your individual self and everyone else.This imperative focuses on how you should always acknowledge everyones value and existence. There is never a time where you should use someone or let someone use you. My first time dealing about Kants moral theory I idea there were only flunkes. After I spent more time analyzing the theory, I instal that there are both strengths and weaknesses. A strength that I found was how Kant really expressed that everyone is to be inured as. Kant says that since all humans are quick-scented beings that we are all capable of respecting others.This is a strength because with everyone using their moral stipulation to treat each other equally things would be a lot easier. plenty would not only consider themselves before acting on something but they would have to make sure they are Blezien 3 considering the moral thing to do. If this idea of equality were universal and followed by everyone there would be a lot less violence, depression, and racial tension. Which would leave everyone overall satisfied since everybody is succeeding(a) the moral law. A critical weakness I found in Kants moral theory is that he says there is a right and upon for everything.This is a weakness because there are many a(prenominal) examples where using good will isnt the best answer. For example when I read that Kant suggested that if a killer comes to your house and asked where your acquaintances hip is to kill him you must tell the truth. That seems a little extreme and I have to disagree that would be the best thing to do. Your emotions would sure be going kookie which already makes your answer morally wrong according to Kant. He needs to know where to draw the line and shouldnt be only on one side.In this paper I have draw the basic principles of Kants moral theory. I have learned that without having a good will you can never be morally right according to Kant. His categorical imperatives show a lot of legality and equality, but when it comes down something simple interchangeable lying to someone who wants to kill your booster dose to save your friends life youre not morally correct. Overall, Kants moral theory was very interesting to study how philosophers thought back then. I wonder what Kant would telephone if he knew how much we let our emotions make our decisions.