'Culture and Beliefs Essay\r'

' dissimilar cultures and beliefs tidy sum have an effect on implementing anti- judicial rule. cardinal exercise of this preventing anti- discriminative practice is though in a culture secernateing ‘please’ and ‘thank you’ to things, where in an a nonher(prenominal) culture this whitethorn not be normal and so if somebody doesn’t say thank you or please to something this may be seen as rude, and could make the person treat the other person disaccordently.\r\nAnother federal agency culture and beliefs can affect implementing anti-discriminatory practice is that people may envision a person’s situation, or not understanding why person behaves in that way and then the professionals own views or stereotypes go out hold control over the way the person treats the individualistic and then this wont promote anti-discriminatory practice. This may differ depending on where the health awe background is for example if it is in to a greater e xtent of a multi-cultural argona, beliefs and views may be contrastive.\r\nNot understanding the importance If fright providers put on’t understand the importance of promoting anti-discriminatory practice, they are more likely to not act as in an anti discriminatory practice. Care providers should be awake(predicate) of the wide awake promotion of anti discriminatory practice in order for the service users of health and sociable care to get the best of the services.\r\nIf care providers fail to work in an anti discriminatory practice, service users will be not treated fairly and their choices wouldn’t be respected or taken into account, so therefore it is very important for health and social care professionals to work in an anti discriminatory practice. If the care settings fail to promote an anti discriminatory practice, service users will be marginalised and disempowered and this can bring to stress and depression and can trigger challenging behaviour. The way in which anti-discriminatory ractice is promoted may be different in different health and social care setting such as a take aim will digest more on children where as an residential care home may focus more on elderly or disability.\r\n avocation the ‘norm’ Both care providers and service users are utilise to doing what is the ‘norm’ for them. This can cause problems when promoting anti-discriminatory practice because if for example a care provider is used to carrying out authorized behaviour then they may ignore newfangled anti-discriminatory practice that has been introduced because it is something they are not used to doing.\r\nThis can cause loads of problems because it center service users may be neglected and discriminated against because new practice is not being followed. This could also sometimes be down to the age of the care provider. If someone has been working in a care setting for a long time they may be used to caring in a certain way which means that they will not admit appropriately to new practice where as someone who is new will be fully aware of the new procedures in place so may be more likely to follow them.\r\n'