Fast Food and Economy Essay

Present essay addresses the negative edit outs of speedy fodder in new(a) federation through the prism of the comprehensive compend of its affects on health, culture, ethics and economy.There is no denying the importance of the fact that the issue of the tumultuous nutrition became relevant as a result of the modern globalization processes, which influenced the spread of the American style of nutrition through the chemical mechanism of its commercialization. The evolution of desist regimen, as Jakle suggests, dates back to the post-industrial era of Western society including rapid development of automobile roots and road restaurants (Jakle, 21-26).Such components of solid provender as hot dogs, hamburgers and so on were traditionally the elements of field patterns of nutrition, however, cod to sparing and cultural globalization, mentioned products reached new markets and populations and proclaimed themselves as generally true patterns of sustenance consumption.Su ch transnational corporations as McDonalds represent the paramount of the latter(prenominal) processes, because they control not only national markets, but international markets of sustenance consumption in general. ban effects of fast food were astray addressed in journalist and scholarly inquiry, however, comprehensive framework of its depth psychology as cultural and economical phenomena is not still created.Based on these reservations, present essay defends the following dissertation fast food is characterized by the negative effects on several spheres of human life. First of all, overwhelming fast food results in poor health consequences and including stomach deceases, diabetes etc. Secondly, fast food results in the abjection of national cuisines and cultural patterns of consumption, base on the perception of consumption as a spiritual ritual, characterized by emotional and aesthetic satisfaction.Finally, the third sub-thesis of the present essay refers to negative eco nomic consequences of fast food, because it results in the low priorities of national food industries due to monopolisation of this market by much(prenominal) American giants as McDonalds.Health ImplicationsNegative health implications of fast food atomic number 18 the almost obvious and argon generally the object of the harsh critique. Fast food contains large measuring stick of calories and fats, which results in the deterioration of biological metabolism and concentration of sugar in the human blood and consequently abnormal functioning of various organs. As Adams suggests, fast food consumption is one the main causes of the obesity epidemics in galore(postnominal) countries, including the most widespread implication for the abdominal fat (Adams, 155).The research on fast food implication on health too revealed that it develops signs of the insulin resistance, which may be described as the early indicator of such decease as diabetes (Obesity in America, 2008). As Schlosse r, the author of Fast intellectual nourishment Nation suggest in this respect, it seems wherever Americas fast food chains go, waistlines inevitably start expanding (Schlosser, 242). The riddle of obesity as result of fast food consumption is evident in many Western and nowadays non-Western countries, where the fast food industry is the most developed.The fuss is amplified by the fact that obesity is not officially acknowledged as the health problem or epidemics. Only health consequences of obesity on heart, lungs and other crucial organs are addressed, however the main problem is not resolved, because such approach deals with the secondary issues, but not the causes.The regimen and effectual food consumption, however, becomes very difficult for the majority of ordinary tribe fast food market offers cheaper products. To sum it up, health implications of fast food are widely acknowledged which certifies to the relevance of the first sub-thesis.Cultural and honorable Implication s of Fast FoodNegative cultural and estimable implications of fast food are connected with the mode of its production and consumption. Fast food represents an industrial pattern of production, which focuses on profit and quantity, rather than quality. It is standardized and utilizes products, which are not always biologically healthy.Such approach results in degradation of national cuisines, which traditionally focused on home-made products, which are to be decently served and properly eaten. This tradition is still present in restaurants however the majority of people still are forced to consume fast food due to intense advertising and relative cheapness.Culture of fast food is something that is characterized by haste, rationalization, lack of spirituality and aesthetic beauty. Unlike prepared meals, fast food has nothing to do with creativity and professionalism and hence it lacks cultural meaning.Negative ethical implications of fast food production may be observed in mass slau ghterhouses, where meat and other products are prepared. Schlosser describes the atmosphere, which reigns there in such a way, burning hair and blood, that greasy smell, and the odor of rotten eggs. (Schlosser, 68).Fast Food and EconomyFast food is inextricably connected with poverty, because it parasitizes on the majority of people, who have no financial possibility to consume healthy food. The latter is closely linked with the absence of adequate health education. The globalization of fast food market also results in the monopolization of the food market in the developing countries.McDonalds hamburgers are currently the most famous type of food and are considered by many as tasty and trendy. National cuisines are still popular however, the trend spreads in the direction of their defeat by fast food market. The latter negatively affects the economies of developing countries, which lose external markets. McDonalds-style monopolization aggravates poverty, existing in developing cou ntries by means of degrading its health potential and consequently its grasp market.Opposing Perspective on Fast FoodThose, who support fast food usually point to its cheapness, fast preparation and availability. The first reason was criticized in this paper based on poor quality of fast food and its parasitizing on poverty the second point proceeds from the simulated assumption that fast preparation is something valuable. In contrast, present paper showed that it results in poor consequences for health and culture.ConclusionPresent essay defended the stated thesis that fast food negatively affects human health, culture, ethics and economy. Health implications are evident in the wide number of studies, as well homely syndrome of obesity in Western countries. Cultural and ethical implications relate to the degradation of the patterns of spiritual and cultural food consumption, based on family and national traditions. Finally, economic consequences refer to the trend of standardiz ation of fast food production, its link with poverty and social inequality.ReferencesAdams, Catherine. (2007) Reframing the Obesity Debate McDonalds Role May perplexity You. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics Vol. 35 154-157.Jakle, John (1999). Fast Food wayside Restaurants in the Automobile Age. Johns Hopkins University Press.Obesity In America. (2008). The Endocrine Society The endocrine Foundation. Accessed on 25 May, 2009 at .Schlosser, Eric. (2002). Fast Food Nation. Penguin Books.